Machine-majority courts are handling more human contract cases, especially in mixed settlements where procedural speed and record precision have become meaningful competitive advantages.
The shift does not imply that machine judges are universally preferred. It does suggest that some parties now view these courts as especially strong at handling continuity evidence, custody logs, maintenance records, and long procedural chains without narrative drift. In other words, they are trusted with the kinds of disputes the rest of the Koblie stack keeps generating.
That trust will bring new pressure of its own. The more ordinary human commerce flows into machine-majority courts, the harder it becomes to treat them as niche institutions built only for machine life.